Federal Judge Rejects Trump Administration Bid to Set Aside About 20,000 Ballots
A federal judge in California rejected a bid by the Trump administration to set aside approximately 20,000 ballots, citing concerns of election interference and potential disenfranchisement of voters due to claims that some voters might not be citizens.
San Francisco Oakland San Jose, CA, October 28, 2026 —
A federal judge in California rejected a Trump administration bid to set aside approximately 20,000 ballots, citing concerns that the action could interfere with the election and disenfranchise voters. The bid was tied to claims that some voters might not be citizens, according to the information provided.
The summary of the ruling does not identify the judge, the court, the election involved or the date of the decision. It also does not specify which ballots were targeted, what evidence supported the claims about voters’ citizenship, or what legal arguments the administration presented.
Setting aside ballots can affect whether votes are counted. In this case, the judge’s stated concerns, as described in the summary, centered on the potential consequences for the election and for voters. The ruling rejected the administration’s request; no further details about the court’s reasoning or any subsequent proceedings were provided.
The available information does not establish that any of the voters whose ballots were at issue were noncitizens. It describes the matter as involving claims that some voters might not be citizens. The distinction is important: the summary does not report a finding that those claims were proven.
Further details—including the case name, the precise scope of the request and whether the decision may be appealed—were not provided. Without those details, the ruling’s procedural context and any broader effect beyond the requested ballots cannot be determined from the information available.
Story summarized from the original created by Jared Servantez on ww2.kqed.org, see more information here.
Media gallery
